中等强国与区域大国身份的互构--韩国与印度尼西亚的比较分析  

The Identity Inter-Construction between Middle Power and Regional Power: A Comparative Study between South Korea and Indonesia

作　　者：李峰[1] 郑先武[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学国际关系研究院 [2]南京大学中国南海研究协同创新中心

出　　处：《当代韩国》2016年第1期54-68,共15页Contemporary Korea

基　　金：2015年度国家社科基金一般项目“二战后东南亚区域合作起源与演变研究(1945-1967)”(项目编号:15BSS040)的阶段性成果;江苏省“青蓝工程”中青年学术带头人项目资助

摘　　要：在区域与全球趋势的共同作用下,韩国与印尼的实践体现出中等强国与区域大国身份间互构、中等强国身份间互补及区域大国身份间互补的特征。本文在区域与体系的互动中,通过案例分析,探究了前述三组身份间的作用关系。本文指出中等强国与区域大国身份间的互构是三组关系中的重点;进而在比较分析基础上认为,在韩国与印尼的中等强国与区域大国身份互构中,区域是两类身份的共同基础,也是两国比较分析中差异的关键,即区域大国身份更具基础性;区域安全则是两种身份实践的共同指向,亦是互构的指向。在两种身份互构的趋势下,区域层次的中等强国即区域大国;而基于安全能力建设与规范设置的区域自主是身份互构的主要特征。Under the co-tendency of both the regional and the global,the practice of South Korea and Indonesia shows the characteristics of their identity inter-construction between middle power and regional power,between different middle powers and between different regional powers.In the interaction of region and system,and through case study,we investigate the relationship of the former identities,and argue that the key is the identity inter-construction between middle power and regional power.And further,through comparative study,we argue that in the identity inter-construction of S.Korea and Indonesia,the region is the common ground of the identity both the regional and the middle,and the key to the differences between S.Korea and Indonesia;In other words,the regional power identity is more fundamental.While regional security becomes the common directivity of the both identities and their interconstruction.Under the inter-construction between middle power and regional power,the regional power equals the middle power in the regional level,and the main characteristic of identity inter-construction is regional autonomy,which based on security capacity-building and norm-setting.

关 键 词：韩国 印度尼西亚 区域大国 中等强国 身份互构 区域安全 

分 类 号：D831.26[政治法律—政治学] D834.2[政治法律—外交学]