亲属相盗案件量刑不均问题研究——以1998年司法解释为视角  

On Unequal Sentencing on Cases of Theft between Relatives——From the Perspective of the Judicial Interpretation in 1998

作　　者：廖秀平 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《福建警察学院学报》2016年第1期80-85,共6页Journal of Fujian Police College

基　　金：西南政法大学法学院研究生科研创新项目"亲属相盗案件的量刑规范化研究"(FXY2014036)

摘　　要：亲属相盗相关规范主要存在三个问题:第一,亲属相盗的相关概念界定不明;第二,1998年司法解释对有关亲属相盗问题的规定模糊;第三,对此类案件的量刑情节——亲属规定不完善。这些问题最终会导致亲属相盗案件量刑不均。为避免此结果,可采取以下措施:第一,重新界定亲属相盗案件的相关概念;第二,明确1998年《解释》的相关规定;第三,规范此类案件的量刑情节——亲属。Three problems about the theft between relatives are found due to the study of the relevant laws and regulations. They are： firstly,the definition of theft between relatives is not clear; secondly,judicial interpretations in 1998 aimed at such cases are vague; thirdly,the definition of relative is too incomplete to be circumstance for sentencing. These problems would lead to an unjust judgment in theft-between-relative cases. In order to avoid it,we suggest that： first of all,the related concepts should be defined again; the judicial interpretations in 1998 need a further improvement; finally,what relative＇ means should be clear enough so that it can be one of the qualified circumstances for sentencing.

关 键 词：亲属 亲属相盗 量刑不均 

分 类 号：D914.35[政治法律—刑法学]