最高人民法院如何统一法律适用——非正规释法技艺的考察  

Supreme people''s court to unify the legal application,informal interpretation skills of inspection

作　　者：安晨曦[1] 

机构地区：[1]海南大学法学院,海南海口570228

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第3期49-59,共11页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：2013年国家社科基金项目(13BFX010)"我国转型社会中的法治思维研究";海南省教育厅2015年创新科研课题(Hyb2015-07)"政法传统中司法政策对民事诉讼的影响研究"

摘　　要：最高法院借由法律解释权分化,事实上成为中国境遇中的释法主角。对最高法院释法技艺的考察表明,司法解释是其正规的释法技术策略。以中国的政法逻辑为轴心,法院执行政党政策的姿态已然演绎成"政党政策——政策解释"的中国惯例;以例辅律的指导性案例制度、大法官以政治角色表达的权威话语、最低限度的适法共识——会议纪要、法律家撰文释法等非正式形态,逐渐形塑为替代型释法策略。选择非正规技艺统一之道的考虑在于:镶嵌在政治生态中的司法权运行逻辑、释法追加成本的多寡、供给司法解释"再解释"的应时性需求、降低司法解释执行的不确定性风险等因素。The Supreme Court has become the factual leading actor of interpreting law in Chinese background through separation of law interpretation power. Research on the Supreme Court＇s interpreting skills shows that judicial interpretation is the official strategy of interpreting law. Taking logics of Chinese politics and laws as axes,the court＇s posture of executing political party＇s policy has become Chinese convention of ＂ political party＇s policy- policy interpretation＂. Unofficial forms like guiding cases institution of regulation as auxiliary and law as main one,authorized words of grand justice in political part,lowest level of common sense in legitimacy（ summary of conversations,jurists＇ interpretation of law,and so on） etc.have gradually been shaped to a fungible type of law interpretation strategy. Factors which should be considered in choosing ways of unofficial skills＇ unification are judicial power＇s operation logic inset into political ecology,amount of law interpretation＇s additional costs,timely need of supplying judicial interpretation to re- interpretand lower uncertain risk of judicial interpretation＇s execution,etc.

关 键 词：统一法律适用 政策解释 指导性案例 司法会议 法律家撰文 

分 类 号：DF0-05[政治法律—法学理论]