论票据流通中的直接交付  

Discuss on Validity of Transferring Instrument with Delivery

作　　者：赵意奋[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波315211

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2016年第3期145-154,共10页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(12BFX096);浙江省人文社科重点研究基地课题(JDF1401);王宽城教育基金会的资助

摘　　要：票据流通中有两种转让方式,背书和直接交付。直接交付作为非典型的转让方式,往往是转让人和受让人自由选择的结果。以美国为例,即使在转让人非自愿的情形下,为了保护票据的流通,尤其是对正当持票人的保护,在自由主义原则指导下,只要符合推定交付的要件,便承认其效力。直接交付均发生在无记名票据和空白背书流转中,我国《票据法》除了对无记名支票态度不明确外,明确否定了无记名汇票和本票、空白背书的持票人权利,因此从源头上否定了将直接交付作为票据转让方式。但是,这种否定却违背了票据流通之本性,因此建议修改我国《票据法》相关条文,承认无记名票据和空白背书,建立票据直接交付制度。The instrument is negotiated by indorsement and delivery. How an instrument has been transferred is the chosen by the transferor and transferee. In U. S. A,if the issuer or holder has involuntarily relinquished control over the instrument,it seems that he should be unable to assert,as a defense,that it was not issued or transferred. There seem to be two basic approaches,one is that deliverer has voluntarily relinquished control over the instrument,another is that control or ownership was obtained by transferee. The purpose of the rule is in favor ofnegotiation and holder in due course. Delivery is always negotiable way of bearer paper or black indorsement paper. But our negotiable law ruled that it is invalid if the payee is black of the draft or note,and if there are black indorsement. However,an instrument is treated as a negotiable instrument because of negotiation. So,no matter what the instrument is negotiated by indorsement or delivery,the holder has important rights,which include the ability to negotiate the instrument further and to enforce the instrument in his own name. The validity of delivery should be admitted.

关 键 词：流通 直接交付 无记名票据 空白背书 

分 类 号：DF438[政治法律—经济法学]