检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]四川省新津县人民医院五官科,四川新津611430 [2]四川省肿瘤医院头颈外科二病区,四川成都610000
出 处:《吉林医学》2016年第5期1063-1065,共3页Jilin Medical Journal
摘 要:目的:探讨及改进会厌囊肿手术治疗的方法。方法:收集行会厌囊肿切除术患者60例,分为A、B两组,A组使用动态镜下会厌囊肿低温射频消融术,共30例;B组采用传统支撑喉镜下会厌囊肿切除手术,共30例,记录术中出血量、手术时间、术后创面愈合时间、术后并发症的发生例数。结果:60例会厌囊肿手术病例经动态随访均痊愈。A、B两种方式均能顺利地完成手术。A组在手术时间、术中出血量、术后恢复时间上均少于B组,两组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:表面麻醉喉动态镜下会厌囊肿低温射频消融术治疗会厌囊肿疗效满意,手术时间短,术中出血少,术后恢复时间短,术后基本无并发症发生,手术操作简单有效,费用低廉,值得推广。Objective To investigate the effective and safety of modifying treatment of epiglottic cyst with radiofrequency ablation in superficial anesthesia. Method Sixty patients diagnosed with epiglottic cyst were devided into two groups( group A and group B). Group A enrolled 30 patients were performed with radiofrequency ablation in superficial anesthesia,group B,with 30 patients,were performed with Epiglottic cyst excision under suspension laryngomircoscope in general anesthesia. Intraoperation blood loss,enduration and recovery time,complications postoperation were compared. Results All the patients recovered under the following 2 weeks. procedure had been finished sucessfully by technique A and B both,A was better than B in operation blood loss,duration and recovery time( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Treatment of epiglottic cyst with radiofrequency ablation is superior than traditional epiglotiic cyst incision with reducing the blood loss and enduration time,recovery time and postoperationo complications.
分 类 号:R767.91[医药卫生—耳鼻咽喉科]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68