检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张皓[1]
出 处:《晋阳学刊》2016年第3期45-59,共15页Academic Journal of Jinyang
基 金:2013年度国家社科基金项目"蒙藏委员会委员长更迭与国民政府治藏政策演变轨迹研究"(13BMZ032)的阶段性成果之一
摘 要:1929年至1930年,中英两国政府围绕尼藏冲突的"调解"展开了一场激烈的较量。冲突的发生,是英国政府竭力维持在藏特权和阻止西藏地方与中央关系正常化的必然结果,它以调解为名遣人入藏,其目的也在于此。国民政府也以调解为名派人分别前往尼泊尔和西藏,一方面是为了恢复中尼传统的政治关系,一方面是宣示对西藏的主权并设法解决西藏问题。因此,双方展开的较量具有各自的战略意义。A dispute on the crisis between Nepal and Hsitsang took place between the Chinese and British governments from 1929 to 1930. Because British government tried its best to maintain its privileges in Hsitsang and to stop the political relation normalization between the local Hsitsang and the central government, the crisis between Nepal and Hsitsang happened unavoidably. British government sent Laden La to Hsitsang. He seemed to mediate the crisis, but his real aim was to maintain British privileges and to stop the political relation normalization between the local Hsitsang and the central government. The Chinese government also sent Ba Wenjuan and Xie Guoliang to Nepal and Hsitsang on the pretext of mediation. They went there to resume the traditional relations between China and Nepal on one hand, and to claim China's sovereignty over Hsitsang and try their best to solve Hsitsang problems on the other. Thus we can make conclusion from the dispute around the mediation of crisis that the National-British governments each have their own strategic significance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46