检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱高龙[1,2]
机构地区:[1]闽江学院地理科学系,福州350108 [2]福建省测绘工程技术研究中心,福州350108
出 处:《农业机械学报》2016年第5期307-314,共8页Transactions of the Chinese Society for Agricultural Machinery
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41271354);福建省高等学校新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目(JA13245);福建省自然科学基金指导性科技计划项目(2012D105)
摘 要:叶面积指数(LAI)是陆地表层生态系统最重要的植被结构参数之一。近年来,利用LAI-2200观测草地叶面积指数的研究逐渐增多,但是其精度验证研究却很少。本文利用LAI-2200获取19个草地样地的有效植被面积指数(PAI_e),并利用草地孔隙率模型模拟LAI-2200测量值,然后与收获法得到的植被面积指数(PAI)进行比较,进而评估LAI-2200的测量精度,并分析草地聚集度系数(CI)的变化规律。结果表明LAI-2200观测天顶角较小的4圈数据计算的PAI_e比5圈数据计算的PAI_e的精度更高;PAI_e与PAI相关性极显著(R2=0.951);当PAI小于3时,PAIe略小于PAI;随着PAI继续增大,PAI_e低估逐渐严重。这种低估现象主要原因是叶片的聚集效应,当PAI小于3时,CI均值为0.97;当PAI为3~6时,CI均值为0.88;当PAI大于6时,CI均值为0.71,因此LAI-2200用于浓密草地测量时需要用CI进行订正。Leaf area index( LAI) is one of the most important structural parameters of terrestrial ecosystems. In recent years,the use of LAI-2200 to measure leaf area index of grassland has gradually increased,but few studies have evaluated the accuracy of the optical method to estimate LAI in grassland ecosystems. In order to validate the measurement accuracy of LAI-2200 for grassland leaf area index,the effective plant area index( PAIe) retrievals by LAI-2200 were compared with the simulated LAI-2200 measurements and the plant area index( PAI) retrievals by destructive sampling in 19 grassland sites. As an additional biophysical parameter of comparable importance to LAI,the clumping index( CI) of grassland was also analyzed. The PAIeretrievals from LAI-2200 4-ring data with smaller zenith angle perform better than from LAI-2200 5-ring data,and correspond very well with the destructive PAI values( R2= 0. 951). Reasonable agreement of the PAIeretrievals from LAI-2200 with the destructive sampling and the simulated results verifies the reliability of LAI-2200 used in sparse grassland. PAIeis slightly less than PAI when PAI is less than 3. As PAI continues to increase,PAIehas been seriously underestimated due to clumping effect: CI = 0. 97 for PAI 3,CI = 0. 88 for 3 PAI 6,and CI = 0. 71 for PAI 6. Therefore,the LAI retrieved from LAI-2200 with the assumption of the random foliage distribution might yield inaccurate results in clumped grass,which need to be corrected using CI values.
关 键 词:草地 叶面积指数 聚集度系数 LAI-2200 精度验证
分 类 号:TP73[自动化与计算机技术—检测技术与自动化装置]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31