检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴展[1,2]
机构地区:[1]上海海关学院法律系 [2]上海海关学院国家2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心"
出 处:《海关与经贸研究》2016年第3期88-103,共16页Journal of Customs and Trade
摘 要:作为中国特色社会主义法律体系的组成部分,我国海关法律体系的运行历史较为长久且完整。审慎考察我国现行海关法律体系可以发现,其在某种程度上也存在立法疏漏、立法冲突等问题,客观上也需要在立法理念、立法模式等领域予以变革。消解现行海关法律体系中的立法冲突等问题,确实需要顺应时代发展要求,更新立法模式,积极、主动地参与国际海关立法,理论上也需要借助违宪审查等机制来增强海关法律体系的统一性、系统性。As a component of China's legal system,customs legal system has a long and complete history. A careful examination of China's current legal system may reveal that there also exist flaws and conflicts in legislation to some extent. Thus objectively speaking,it is necessary to seek for reforms in philosophy and mode of legislation. But the elimination of the conflict occurring in current customs legislation calls for following the development of times,upgrading the mode of legislation and actively and voluntarily involving the international customs legislation. In theory,it is required to scrutinize the legislations against the Constitution,so as to improve the uniformity and comprehensiveness of customs legal system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222