检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《妇女研究论丛》2016年第3期83-91,共9页Journal of Chinese Women's Studies
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"族裔社区的经验与文学表征"(项目编号:15JNKY007);教育部人文社会科学基金项目"庶民学派文学批评探析"(项目编号:12YJA752002)的资助
摘 要:殖民话语以印度传统社会中边缘群体包括女性的受害者地位来建构殖民统治的合法性,这对民族主义者提出了新的挑战,因为他们要同时面对本土传统、殖民现代性、民族文化身份等一系列相互纠葛的问题。为了应对这一挑战,印度民族主义者以物质/精神、家庭/世界、男性/女性等对文化进行了二元划分,以此对抗殖民强势文化并保有自我民族身份。但民族主义者的文化二元论最终断绝了外部社会介入印度妇女问题的可能性,强化了本土男性作为女性行为规范立法者的角色,实际上巩固了印度社会的父权制霸权。Colonial discourse establishes its legitimacy through the configuration of unprivileged groups, especially women, as the victims of the Indian traditional society, which actually constitutes a new challenge for nationalists because they will have to face the entanglement of indigenous tradition, colonial modernity and national cultural identity. To deal with the challenge, Indian nationalist elites split culture into a series of dichotomies, such as material vs. spiritual, home vs. world, men vs. women, so as to resist the dominant colonial culture and thus maintain their national cultural identity. But the dichotomies actually negate all the possibility of interference from outside into women issues in India, which actually reinforces the roles of men as lawmakers of women's behavior principles, and further strengthens the patriarchic hegemony in Indian society.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28