检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈宏飞[1] 张玥[1] 刘广[2] 项阳[1] 孙九林[1,3]
机构地区:[1]陕西师范大学旅游与环境学院,陕西西安710062 [2]陕西师范大学网络信息中心,陕西西安710062 [3]中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100101
出 处:《西北大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第2期292-297,共6页Journal of Northwest University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(41001077);陕西师范大学院士创新基金资助项目(999521)
摘 要:城市公园的服务范围是有关城市公园研究的重要方面,以往主要从可达性方面进行研究。文中以新浪微博数据作为样本数据,探讨了不同距离游客到达公园游览的时空分布规律。结果表明:在[0~10]km范围内,绝大部分公园到访游客随居住地与公园的距离增加,人数呈指数递减规律,总体上公园周边[0~4)km范围内居民到达公园的比例最高,为65.84%,但个别公园因知名度、交通便利性等方面的影响并不完全符合以上规律。同时不同距离的游客在不同时段到达公园游览的比例也有所差异。另外,文中利用新浪微博对城市公园服务范围的问题进行了探讨,为城市公共设施对居民服务范围问题的研究提供了新的研究视角。The scope of city park services is an important aspect of the study on urban park.Mainly researched on the aspects of accessibility in the past.In this paper,Sina microblog data as sample data and in the basis of determining users residence,time-space distribution rule of tourists from different distance to visit park was discussed.It turned out that the vast majority of park visitors shows exponential declining rule with the increasing distance between residence and park in the context of [0 ~ 10]km,and on the whole,residents that are[0~4) km from park have the highest proportion(65.84%) which get to the park.But because of the impact of visibility,convenient transportation and other aspects,individual park does not fully comply with the above law.At the same time,the proportion of tourists arrive at different times in different distance is also different.In addition,in this paper,using Sina Microblog,the issues of urban park service range were discussed,which provides a new perspective to the research on scope of residents services.
分 类 号:TU986[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.94