检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵建树[1] 阮渊 王生介[1] 刘伟峰[1] 厉晓龙[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏大学附属武进人民医院骨科,江苏常州213002
出 处:《生物医学工程与临床》2016年第3期286-292,共7页Biomedical Engineering and Clinical Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨有Modic改变的腰椎间盘突出患者,在行单纯髓核摘除术后中远期治疗效果。方法选择单纯髓核摘除术治疗腰椎间盘突出患者118例,其中男性53例,女性65例;年龄21-77岁,平均年龄47.5岁。根据患者腰椎MRI是否伴有Modic改变及其分型分为4组。A组62例,无Modic改变;B组22例,ModicⅠ型改变;C组25例,ModicⅡ型改变;D组9例,ModicⅢ型改变。统计分析术前及术后分期随访(6、12、36个月)时患者疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分及Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)。结果术前B、C、D组与A组VAS及ODI评分差异无统计学意义,术后各组VAS及ODI评分均有明显改善。根据术后随访6、12、36个月VAS评分及ODI结果示,B、C、D组治疗效果差于A组(P〈0.01);B、C、D组各组间VAS评分及ODI差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。6个月随访时B、C、D组改善率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),12个月随访时C组术后治疗效果维持最佳(P〈0.05)。36个月随访时部分患者复发,其中B组复发率最高(7/22)。结论合并Modic改变的腰椎间盘突出患者行单纯髓核摘除术后效果差于无Modic改变患者;但其中以ModicⅡ型改变术后效果维持最优,故选择ModicⅡ型改变时手术为最佳手术时机。Objective To study the postoperative efficacy and mid-long-term follow-up of lumbar intervertebral disc combined with Modic changes patients after simple discectomy. Methods A total of 118 patients with protrusion of lumbar intervertebral disc were enrolled, which included 53 males and 65 females, aged 21- 77 years old with mean age 47.5 years old.All of them were divided into 4 groups based on Modic changes and its classification, which were Group A(n = 62, non-Modic changes), group B(n = 22, Modic type Ⅰ), group C(n = 25, Modic type Ⅱ) and group D(n = 9, Modic type Ⅲ). The data of preoperative and postoperative follow-up phases(6-month, 12-month and 36-month) in patients with pain visual grading(VAS)and Oswestry disability index(ODI) were analyzed. Results The scores in VAS and ODI of preoperative between group B, C,D and group A were no statistically significant differences, but scores in VAS and ODI of postoperative were improved significantly. For scores in VAS and ODI at six-month, 12-month and 36-month follow-up, effects of Modic changes in group B, C and D were worse than that in group A(P〈0.01), there was no difference between group B, C and D(P〈0.05); the improvement rates of group B, C and D at 6-month follow-up were no significant differences(P〈0.05), group C maintained the best treatment effect at 12-month follow-up(P〈0.05). At the time of 36-month follow-up, some patients relapsed and recurrence rate of group B was highest(7/22). Conclusion It is demonstrated that simple discectomy is one of the effective methods in treatment of non-Modic change lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion, and shows 12-month optimum therapeutic effect in Modic type Ⅱ, but the highest recurrence rate in 36-month.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117