交通警察权与其他行政权的关系及其实现——行政权谱系中的考察  

The Relationship Orientation and its Implementation of Traffic Police Power and other Administrative Power in the Investigation of Administrative Power Spectrum

作　　者：刘启川[1] 

机构地区：[1]东南大学法学院,南京211189

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期129-134,共6页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2011年度国家社会科学基金重大项目资助"现代城市交通发展的制度平台与法律保障机制研究"(11&ZD160);2015年度司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目"道路交通警察权力配置的法治路径"(15SFB3013);2015年度江苏省法学会课题"我国交通警察权要素研究"(SFH2015C02);2015年度东南大学基本科研业务费资助项目"我国交通警察权能改革问题研究"(3213055312)

摘　　要：处于行政权谱系的交通警察权与其他行政权的关系主要表现为职务协助,该定位不仅可为相关规章内容不统一问题提供正当性注解,而且基于法规范与法事实的错位以及城市治理的合作化诉求,也有其存在的正当性基础。两者职务协助关系应在双重维度下展开:交通警察的协助行为应具备基础性条件、职权性要求、被动性情势、裁量性过程4要件;而其他行政主体协助行为的"基础性条件"应更为宽泛。对协助请求遭拒与协助行为责任承担,应规定不同的救济路径。In the administrative power spectrum, the main relationship between traffic police power and other administrative power can be expressed as mutual assistance. This definition not only provides legitimate explanation about the not unified contents of the relevant rules and regulations, but also has the justification of its existence in the fact of the dislocation of law norms and law facts and the demands for cooperative urban governance. The establishment of the relationship should follow dual dimensions. Traffic police assistance should have basic condition, authority requirements, passive situation, and the adjudication process. In contrast, the basic condition for other administrative subject assistant behavior should be more broad. The rejection of request for assistance and the responsibility of assistance should stipulate different relief paths.

关 键 词：交通警察权 行政权 职务协助 行政协助 

分 类 号：D631.5[政治法律—政治学]