试论反垄断行政法律责任的基本原则  

The Research on the Anti-monopoly Basic Principles of Administrative Law Responsibility

作　　者：石英[1] 蒋亚男[1] 吴默琳 

机构地区：[1]辽宁大学法学院,辽宁沈阳110036

出　　处：《辽宁大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期109-113,共5页Journal of Liaoning University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：解决反垄断行政法律责任时,往往存在法律依据不清、法律程序不规范、法律责任幅度难以把握等问题,需要在反垄断法行政法律责任的基本原则框架内加以解决。确定反垄断行政法律责任,需要遵循依法定责原则、行为责任相称原则、成本效益分析原则和严格程序法定原则。其根据在于,依法定责原则使产业政策和竞争政策之间的关系在法律层面得到明晰,依据正当的法律才能定出适当的法律责任;行为责任相称原则和成本效益分析原则使反垄断行政法律责任的种类、幅度都要与行为人违法性程度相匹配,且不是不相称的、随意的、不可预测的;严格程序法定原则使行政责任确定的准司法过程更加规范,使正义的过程和结果以可见化的形式实现。Solving the anti-monopoly administrative legal liability is unclear legal basis, legal procedure and legal responsibility isdifficult to grasp the problem such as amplitude, should be in the frame of the anti-monopoly basic principles of administrative law responsibility. Therefore, the determination of the anti-monopoly administrative legal responsibility need to follow the principle of proportional amount in accordance with the law, behavior responsibility proportion principle, the principle of cost-benefit analysis and strict procedure legal principles. The principle of proportional amount in accordance with the law is that the relationship between the industrialpolicy and competition policy at the legal level is got clear, because the appropriate legal responsibility is determined on the basis of proper law. The principle of behavior responsibility of proportion and cost-benefit analysis principle of the anti-monopoly administrative legalresponsibility, make the behavior match the degree of illegality, and not out of proportion, random, unpredictable. The strict procedure legal principles makes administrative responsibility and determine the quasi-judicial process more standard, also makes the process and result of justice in the form of a visible change implementation.

关 键 词：反垄断 行政法律责任 基本原则 

分 类 号：D992.294[政治法律—国际法学]