检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙国祥[1]
出 处:《东南大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第3期68-77,147,共10页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)
基 金:司法部法治建设与法学理论部级科研项目"预防和惩治腐败刑事法律研究"(12SFB2026)阶段性成果
摘 要:作为现阶段从严惩治腐败政治诉求的刑法回应,《刑法修正案(九)》对贪污贿赂犯罪的立法作了重要修改,许多修改内容均值得肯定。但其总体上并没有破除贪污受贿立法本来存在的结构性积弊,重新编织的贪污受贿刑事法网以及调整的惩治力度,不但没有提升刑法对贪污贿赂犯罪的规制能力,反而是"名严实宽",难以满足反腐败刑法供给的需要。理论上进一步评估和探讨此次刑法对贪污贿赂犯罪修正的得与失,可以为全面修正贪污贿赂犯罪的刑法规定作理论铺垫。In response to the political claim of strictly punishing corruption,Amendment(IX) to the Criminal Law of the People's Republic of China has made significant changes to the legislative regulations on embezzlement and bribery crimes. Generally this amendment does not address the stubborn structural problems in the legislative regulations; rather the newly-formed network of criminal law and its punishment actually weaken the ability of criminal law to function efficiently as an instrument for controlling embezzlement and bribery crimes and combating corruption. A discussion on the gains and losses of the amendment enables us to make preparation for future revisions.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.13.56