《文心雕龙》瑕疵辨析  

Flaws in The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons

作　　者：张国庆[1] 

机构地区：[1]云南大学中文系,云南昆明650091

出　　处：《上海师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期68-75,共8页Journal of Shanghai Normal University(Philosophy & Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目"东亚<诗品><文心雕龙>文献研究集成"(14ZDB068)阶段性成果

摘　　要：《文心雕龙》是中国古代文学理论史上一部卓越的巨著,向以"体大、虑周、思精"而为世所称誉。然而它也有小疵:《乐府》篇的某些观点明显保守、某些处理安排不尽妥当;《哀吊》篇的"赞"语未得要领;《丽辞》篇论先秦对偶辞句而举例有所缺失;《指瑕》篇对个别汉字的用法有误解,并有简单否定文字引申而泥古不变的倾向;《程器》篇对《文心雕龙》全书整体结构的安排与表达有美中不足之处。另一方面,常为学者们批评的《练字》篇的一个所谓瑕疵,却并不一定是瑕疵。The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons, a masterpiece of ancient literature theories in Chinese history, is extensive in scope and brilliant in conception. However, there are flaws in the work., the opinions in ＂Yue Fu＂ Chapter are too conservative, compliments in ＂Ai Diao＂ are beside the point, comments on antitheses of Pre--Qin period and their examples are imperfect, some Chinese characters in ＂Zhi Ci＂ are misused, and ＂Cheng Qi＂ does not do justice to its comments on the arrangement and expression of the whole structure of The Literary Mind and Carving of Dragons. The paper also points out that the so--called flaw in ＂Lian Zi＂ is in fact not a flaw.

关 键 词：刘勰 文心雕龙 瑕疵 

分 类 号：I206.2[文学—中国文学]