检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中日友好医院麻醉科,北京100029 [2]中日友好医院核医学科,北京100029
出 处:《中国医学装备》2016年第6期50-53,共4页China Medical Equipment
摘 要:目的:通过IQ-SPECT和LEHR-SPECT心肌灌注显像模型,研究二者心肌灌注显像的差别。方法:测量IQ-SPECT和LEHR-SPECT心肌灌注显像模型的断层计数灵敏度,并对重建图像的信噪比、冷区对比度和边缘锐利度进行比较分析。结果:IQ-SPECT心肌灌注显像的断层计数灵敏度是LEHR-SPECT心肌灌注显像的4倍;IQ-SPECT所得重建图像的信噪比优于LEHR-SPECT,且差异显著(t=2.346,P<0.05);IQ-SPECT所得重建图像的冷区对比度优于LEHR-SPECT,具有统计学差异(t=2.571,P<0.05);二者所得重建图像的边缘锐利度相比较无差异(t=1.494,P>0.05)。结论:IQ-SPECT心肌灌注显像采集效率高于LEHRSPECT心肌灌注显像,其重建图像的质量明显提高。Objective:To investigate the influence of IQ/SPECT and LEHR/SPECT on myocardial perfusion imaging.Methods: The phantom was used for comparison between IQ/SPECT and LEHR/SPECT after routing acquisition and image reconstruction. We analyzed the influence of IQ/SPECT and LEHR/SPECT on the quality of images.Results: For the phantom image with same acquisition time, IQ/SPECT was superior to LEHR/SPECT. The differences were significant (t=2.346,P〈0.05). The cold area contrast of reconstruction imaging with IQ/SPECT was superior to LEHR/SPECT. The difference was statistically significant (t=2.571,P〈0.05). The edge sharpness has no differences (t=1.494,P〉0.05).Conclusion: For myocardial perfusion imaging, the use of IQ/SPECT can get high quality images.
关 键 词:IQ-单光子发射型电子计算机断层扫描 模型 心肌灌注显像
分 类 号:R817.4[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70