检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵阳市口腔医院口腔颌面外科,贵州贵阳550003
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第12期93-95,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨微创拔牙刀结合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法在下颌近中阻生智齿拔除术中的应用效果。方法将100例下颌近中阻生智齿的患者随机分为观察组和对照组,对照组采用常规拔牙法,观察组采用微创拔牙刀结合高速涡轮牙钻,比较两组的拔牙效果。结果观察组的手术时间短于对照组,拔牙完整性好于对照组,肿胀程度和张口受限度小于对照组,恐惧率、术后并发症少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论微创拔牙刀结合高速涡轮牙钻拔牙法手术时间短,创伤小,术后并发症少。Objective To explore the clinical effect of minimally invasive extraction combined with knife high-speed turbine drill in tooth extraction of mesioangular impaction teeth. Methods 100 cases of mesioangular impaction teeth patients were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, the control group was used conventional extraction method, the observation group was given minimally invasive extraction combined with knife high-speed turbine drill, and the two groups were compared of extraction effect. Results The operation time in the observation group was shorter than that in the control group, the extraction integrity was better than that in the control group, the degree of swelling and the mouth opening were less than that in the control group, the fear rate and postoperative complications in the observation group were less than those in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion Extraction method of minimally invasive extraction combined with knife high-speed turbine drill has short operation time, small trauma, less postoperative complications, worthy of promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.213.240