氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘效果对比  

Effect of Oxygen Atomizing Inhalation and Air Compression Pump in the Treatment of Children With Asthma

作　　者：刘东锋 

机构地区：[1]郑州颐和医院儿科,河南郑州450047

出　　处：《中国继续医学教育》2016年第12期103-104,共2页China Continuing Medical Education

摘　　要：目的对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床效果。方法 2014年7月-2015年4月我院接治的92例哮喘患儿随机分为治疗组和观察组各46例,两组均采取抗炎、化痰、平喘、止咳、糖皮质激素等措施,并雾化吸入布地奈德、异丙托溴铵、生理盐水,观察组应用氧驱动雾化吸入。结果治疗后,观察组的总有效率为91.30%,高于对照组的76.09%,治疗后的PEF、SaO2均高于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。结论氧驱动雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床疗效显著。Objective To compare the clinical effect of oxygen driven atomizing inhalation and air compression pump in the treatment of childhood asthma. Methods 92 cases of asthma patients were divided into the treatment group and the observation group, 46 cases in each group, from July 2014 to April 2015 in our hospital, two groups were taken antiinflammatory, expectorant, antitussive and antiasthmatic and glucocorticoid measures and atomization inhalation of budesonide and isopropyl bromide, saline care, observation group were treated with inhalation of oxygen driven. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 91.30%, higher than 76.09% of the control group, after treatment, Sa O2, PEF were higher than the control group, the difference was statistically significant（P〈0.05）. Conclusion The clinical effect of oxygen driven atomizing inhalation in the treatment of asthma in children is significant.

关 键 词：氧驱动 空气压缩泵 雾化吸入 哮喘 

分 类 号：R694[医药卫生—泌尿科学]