检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨星[1] 刘巍[1] 邓小明[1] 孙海[1] 陈焱[1] 张丰深[1]
机构地区:[1]中国人民解放军第324医院肝胆外科,重庆400020
出 处:《重庆医学》2016年第15期2070-2072,共3页Chongqing medicine
基 金:重庆市卫生局2011年医学科研计划项目面上项目(2011-2-589)
摘 要:目的比较术前磁共振胆胰管成像(MRCP)与腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC术)中胆道造影(IOC)诊断胆囊结石合并可疑胆总管结石的临床价值。方法回顾分析2012年1月至2014年12月该院对胆囊结石合并可疑胆总管结石的272例患者MRCP及LC-IOC的临床资料。结果 MRCP与LC-IOC诊断结果差异无统计学意义(P=0.267);与LC-IOC比较,MRCP诊断胆囊结石合并可疑胆总管结石的一致率为95.22%、敏感性为89.41%、特异性为97.86%;两种方法的吻合系数为Kappa=0.887;ROC曲线下面积为0.936,吻合度强。结论 MRCP能在术前简便、准确、无创地诊断胆囊结石患者是否合并胆总管结石,从而尽量避免并发症发生。Objective To compare the diagnosis values between preoperative MRCP and intraoperative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy with cholecystolithiasis combined potential choledocholithiasis.Methods Clinical data of 272 patients who underwent MRCP and LC-IOC for cholecystolithiasis combined potential choledocholithiasis from January 2012 to December2014in our hospital were analyzed retrospectively.Results The diagnosis values between MRCP and LC-IOC were not statistically different(P=0.267).Compared with LC-IOC,the consistency rate of MRCP was 95.22%,Sen was 89.41%,Spe was 97.86%,Kappa=0.887.The area under the ROC curve was 0.936.Conclusion Cholecystolithiasis combined choledocholithiasis might be diagnosed conveniently and accurately by preoperative MRCP with no invasion to trying to avoid complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117