检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]东南大学经济管理学院,江苏南京210096 [2]南京信息工程大学中国制造业发展研究院,江苏南京210044
出 处:《中国科技论坛》2016年第6期31-36,42,共7页Forum on Science and Technology in China
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71173116);教育部哲学社会科学发展报告项目(13JBG004)
摘 要:分析中美德三国高新技术制造业成长性、结构性以及创新性等特征,比较三国在创新实力以及转化效益等创新产出方面的差异,结果显示:中国高新技术制造业成长前景良好,增长速度较快;实施错位竞争使得高新技术产业内部结构与美德两国有较大差异;创新投入总量不断增长,转化效益显著提升。但与美德相比,存在创新投入强度偏低、创新实力较弱等问题。鉴于此,中国高新技术制造业应当借鉴美德经验,推进自主创新、提升创新效率。It analyzes the growth, structural and innovative characteristics of high-tech manufacturing, compares differences of innovation output in terms of innovation strength and the conversion benefit in the United States, Germany and China. The results find that : Chinese high-tech manufacturing has good growth prospects and faster growth; dislocation competition makes the internal structure of high-tech industry differences with US and Germany; Innovation investment is growing, the conversion efficiency has significantly improved. However, there has lower innovation investment intensity and weaker innovation strength issues. In light of this, it proposes that China should learn development experiences of US and Germany, promote independent innovation and improve innovation efficiency to develop Chinese high-tech manufacturing.
分 类 号:F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30