检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2016年第6期40-42,共3页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:华中科技大学自主创新研究基金项目(2014AA045)
摘 要:目的:探讨我国地方政府的财政分权程度对于该地方卫生支出效率的影响。方法:运用我国省际层面的面板数据,采用DEA方法测度地方政府的卫生支出效率,设定面板数据Tobit模型,并通过固定效应方法对模型参数进行估计。结果:地方政府的财政分权程度对地方政府卫生支出效率有显著的负向影响,过度分权不利于地方政府卫生支出效率的提高。结论:财政分权程度过高容易造成各级政府为经济增长而竞争,从而忽视了对公共卫生的供给效率,造成地方政府卫生支出效率较低。Objective:To discuss the effect of local government's fiscal decentralization on the efficiency of health expenditure inChina.Methods:Based on the panel data of inter-provincial level, DEA method was applied to measure the health expenditure effi-ciency of local government, set the Tobit model of panel data and estimate the model parameter through fixed efficiency method.Results:The degree of local government's fiscal decentralization had significant negative effect on health expenditure efficiency of localgovernment. Excessive decentralization could be unfavorable for the improvement of health expenditure efficiency of local government.Conclusion:Excessive decentralization of government finance could easily stimulate the competition for economic growth in differentlevels of governments, which resulted the ignoring the efficiency of public health supply and low efficiency of local government healthexpenditure.
分 类 号:R1[医药卫生—公共卫生与预防医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38