检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭华伟 郑万会[1,2,3] 张云[1,2,3] 颜维华[1,2,3] 朱小玲[1,2,3] 刘宪[1,2,3] 张培林[1,2,3]
机构地区:[1]重庆市医院成本管理研究中心,重庆400700 [2]重庆市第九人民医院,重庆400700 [3]重庆市卫生经济学会秘书处,重庆400700
出 处:《中国卫生经济》2016年第6期58-61,共4页Chinese Health Economics
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(14BGL112);重庆市卫生计生委医学科研计划项目(20143044)
摘 要:目的:比较分析重庆市不同类型县级公立医院运营效率,并测算效率损失程度、探究效率损失根源。方法:利用重庆市2012—2014年医疗机构主要指标汇编数据,运用非参数共同前沿方法进行分析。结果:在共同前沿条件下,综合医院和中医院运营效率得分均值为0.742和0.719,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);在组别前沿条件下,综合医院和中医院运营效率得分均值为0.754和0.790,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。综合医院组内组别前沿和共同前沿运营效率得分均值为0.758和0.742,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);中医院组为0.790和0.682,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。综合医院和中医院技术落差比率均值为0.984和0.863,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。综合医院和中医院无效率得分均值为0.258和0.318,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。技术无效率和管理无效率对综合医院效率损失的贡献度分别为4.64和95.36,中医院为33.99和66.01。结论:重庆市县级公立医院显著存在技术异质性特征,并且不同类型县级公立医院技术异质性表现程度存在显著差异;综合医院效率损失主要来源于落后的管理水平,中医院由生产技术水平和管理水平双重因素所致。Objective:To compare the operational efficiencies of different county-level public hospitals in Chongqing, estimatethe efficiency loss and explore the reason for the loss.Methods:Data from indicators of medical institutions of Chongqing from 2012 to 2014 were adopted and analyzed by the non-parametric meta-frontier method.Results:Under the metafrontier, the mean values ofoperational efficiency scores in general public hospitals and traditional Chinese medical(TCM hospitals were 0.742 and 0.719, the dif-ference had statistic difference(P0.05); under the condition of group frontier, the mean values of operational efficiency scores in gen-eral public hospitals and TCM hospitals were 0.754 and 0.790, the difference had statistic difference(P0.05). The mean values of op-erational efficiency scores of group frontier and metafrontier in general hospital were 0.758 and 0.742, the difference had statistic dif-ference(P0.05); these of TCM group were 0.790 and 0.682, the difference had statistic difference(P0.05). The mean values of tech-nological gap ratio in general public hospitals and TCM hospitals were 0.984 and 0.863, the difference had statistic difference(P0.05). The mean values of non-efficiency in general public hospitals and TCM hospitals were 0.258 and 0.318, the difference had sta-tistic difference(P0.05). The contribution rates of non-efficiencies in technology and management on the losses of general hospital ef-ficiency were 4.64 and 95.36, while these for TCM hospitals were 33.99 and 66.01.Conclusion:County-level public hospitals ofChongqing had significant technology heterogeneity, while different county-level public hospitals had significant different in heteroge-neity performance; the efficiency losses of general hospitals were mainly resulted by backward management level while these of TCMhospitals were resulted by production technology level and management level.
分 类 号:R197.322[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3