检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘青杨[1]
出 处:《哈尔滨工业大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第3期42-45,共4页Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:黑龙江大学研究生创新项目"公众人物名誉权研究"(YJSCX2014-015HLJU)
摘 要:警察由于社会职能的特殊性,其在执行公务的过程中拥有自由裁量权。警察自由裁量权作为警察权力的重要组成部分,有其存在的正当性。警察自由裁量权是实现一般正义和个别正义的最佳途径,兼具公平和正义的法之价值。然而有权力必有限制,当前警察自由裁量权存在滥用、乱用以及有失公平正义的问题,需要对警察自由裁量权进行立法控制、司法控制、行政内部控制,从而提高警察的职业素质。对警察自由裁量权加以限制,这是现代法治社会的必然要求。Because of the particularity of social functions,the police can exercise certain rights in the process of performing official duties with discretion. There is legitimacy of existence to introduce the police discretion as an important part of the police power. The police free judge rights is the best way to realize general justice and individual justice,both the value of fairness and justice of the law. However,where there is right,there is restriction. At present,there exist the problems of abuse and loss of the right of justice in applying the police free judge rights. The need for legislative control,judicial control,and internal control of the police administrative discretion thus arise so as to improve the quality of police occupation. Restriction on the discretion of the police is an inevitable requirement of modern society ruled by law.
关 键 词:警察权力 自由裁量权 立法控制 司法控制 行政内部控制 职业素质
分 类 号:D922.14[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70