检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《黑龙江高教研究》2016年第6期139-141,共3页Heilongjiang Researches on Higher Education
基 金:黑龙江省教育厅高等教育教学改革项目"创新教学督导工作提高高校教学质量的研究"(编号:JG2014010864)
摘 要:阐释泰勒的课程与教学理论、派纳的课程与教学理论,二者尽管在研究基础、研究方法、对课程本质的认识、对课堂教学活动的影响、对教学评价等方面存在很大的差异,但也存在内在统一性;二者都存在缺陷,也都存在值得借鉴之处。在分析研究现阶段我国普通高校体育课程与教学的基础上,提出应借鉴泰勒理论与派纳理论,取其精华,促进我国普通高校体育课程与教学改革。Taylor and Peine's theory of curriculum and teaching are explained in the paper respectively. Although there are some differences in research foundation,research methods,understanding of curriculum's nature,effects of classroom teaching activities,teaching evaluation and other aspects,the internal unity is in existence of the two. Both of them have defects as well as advantages. On the basis of analysis of the current physical education curriculum and teaching in China's ordinary universities,it is proposed to draw on the experience from Taylor's theory and Peine's theory,absorb the quintessence so as to facilitate the physical education curriculum and teaching reforms in China's ordinary universities.
关 键 词:泰勒理论 派纳理论 普通高校 体育课程 体育教学
分 类 号:G642.3[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117