检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2016年第2期46-53,共8页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:2011年度国家社科基金"社会转型期群体性事件的心理疏导与犯罪防范对策研究"(11BFX104)
摘 要:私营企业是我国非公有制经济的重要组成部分,对社会主义市场经济的发展起着重要的助推作用。以刑法来加强对私营企业财产权的平等保护,是促进私营企业法治化发展的必然要求。从现有法律规定来看,私营企业财产权的刑法保护立法相对滞后,且与国有企业财产权的刑法保护相比,在罪与非罪、此罪与彼罪及追诉标准方面都存在明显的差异,"厚公薄私"的印迹比较突出,导致私营企业财产权刑法保护的力度较弱,缺乏平等性。因此,应当通过确立平等的保护原则、建构系统的罪刑体系,以及规定统一的追诉标准来实现刑法对民营企业财产权的平等保护。As an important part of non-public economy in our country, the private enterprise plays an key role in the development of the socialist market economy. Strengthening the equal protection for property fights of private enterprise is inevitable, which promotes the development of private enterprises under the rule of law. Inspecting the existing laws and regulations, the legislation of protecting private enterprise' s property in criminal law lags those of state-owned enterprise relatively. In terms of crime or non-crime, this crime or other crime, there are obvious differences on prosecution criterion, the imprinting of making fish of state-owned enterprise and flesh of private enterprise is more outstanding, which results in the weakness and inequality of the protection strength. Therefore, it is necessary to realize the equal protection for property rights of private enterprise in criminal law by establishing equal protection principle, constructing the systematic crimes system, and making the uniform standard of prosecution criterion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15