“共同但有区别责任”内涵审视与适用研究——以国际气候变化谈判为视角  

The Study on Review and Application of “Common but Differentiated Responsibility”——In the Perspective of the International Climate Change Negotiations

作　　者：刘健[1] 彭丽娟[1] 

机构地区：[1]湖南师范大学法学院,湖南长沙410081

出　　处：《湘潭大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2016年第3期35-39,共5页Journal of Xiangtan University:Philosophy And Social Sciences

基　　金：湖南省科技厅软科学研究计划项目"绿色湖南建设背景下生态补偿机制的路径选择研究"(2014ZK3001)阶段性成果

摘　　要：共同但有区别的责任原则是《联合国气候变化框架公约》和《京都议定书》确认的国际社会应对气候变化基本原则。但是在后京都谈判进程中,面临着被重新解释和修正的挑战。面对新的发展形势和谈判情境,发展中国家要坚守共同但有区别在应对气候变化谈判中的地位,需要对共同但有区别的责任原则的气候正义内涵重新审视,正视原则适用中面临的问题,积极参与并推动国际社会气候变化谈判。The principle of common but differentiated responsibility,which is confirmated as the basic principle in United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and Kyoto Protocol,is the foundation and the core of international cooperation on climate change. But in the Kyoto process,facing challenges of reinterpreted and correction. Facing the new situation of development and negotiation situation,developing countries should stick to common but differentiated in response to climate change negotiations,need to re- examine environmental justice connotation,in order to gain the initiative and flexible negotiating position,actively participate in and promote the international climate change negotiations.

关 键 词：共同但有区别责任 气候正义 气候变化谈判 

分 类 号：D922.6[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]