父母子女教育心理控制源的变化及与孤独症儿童干预成效的关系  

Relationship between intervention effect in the autistic children and the changes of parenting locus of control of the parents

作　　者：章丽丽[1] 刘毅梅[1] 吴燕玲[1] 魏艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]无锡市儿童医院,江苏无锡214023

出　　处：《中国儿童保健杂志》2016年第6期619-621,共3页Chinese Journal of Child Health Care

基　　金：江苏省科技厅科社会发展计划(BE2013619)

摘　　要：目的探讨孤独症儿童父母的子女教育心理控制源变化及与儿童干预成效的关系。方法对在2009年1月-2011年12月确诊的40名孤独症儿童及其父母80名分别进行孤独症行为量表(ABC)、儿童期孤独症评定量表(CARS)、子女教育心理控制源量表(PLOC)的评估,并在2014年12月-2015年3月期间对上述儿童及其家长进行复评。结果孤独症儿童ABC、CARS复评得分明显低于初评得分(P<0.01);父、母PLOC初评、复评变化差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);父PLOC总分、因子5与儿童ABC、CARS变化有相关性,母PLOC总分、因子1、因子5与儿童ABC、CARS变化有相关性。结论孤独症儿童阶段性干预成效显著,但是孤独症儿童父母在教育子女方面仍然存在显著问题,并对干预成效产生影响。Objective To analyse the changes of parenting locus of control（PLOC）in the autistic childrens＇ parents,and to determine the correlation between the intervention effect in autistic children and PLOC of parents. Methods Data were obtained from 40 autistic children and 80 parents,Childhood Autism Rating Scale（CARS）,Autism Behavior Checklist（ABC）,PLOC were evaluated two times.The first time was in January 2009 to December 2011,the second was in December2014 to March 2015.The correlation coefficients between PLOC and CARS,ABC scores in autistic children were calculated. Results The score of CARS and ABC in re-intervention had a remarkable decrease（P〈0.01）than those in pre-intervention.There were no differences at total PLOC and five factors between the two assessment.PLOC score,factor 1,factor 5in mother and PLOC score,factor 5in father were related to the CARS,ABC scores＇ changes. Conclusions Intervention effect of autistic child is significant.Many problems in child education are still found in the parents.The education attitude of parents would impact on the effect of intervention in autistic child.

关 键 词：孤独症 子女教育心理控制源 干预成效 

分 类 号：R179[医药卫生—妇幼卫生保健]