检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘崇俊[1]
出 处:《中医临床研究》2016年第9期136-137,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨不同中药饮片炮制方法的临床作用。方法:选取2013年1月—2015年1月我院收治的使用中药饮片治疗的患者100例,随机分为两组,观察组和对照组,每组50例。对照组患者给予普通的中药治疗,观察组患者采用经过炮制的中药饮片进行治疗,比较两组患者临床治疗疗效。结果:观察组临床疗效为显效、有效和无效的分别为29例、18例和3例,治疗总有效率为94.0%,对照组临床疗效为显效、有效和无效的分别为17例、23例和10例,治疗总有效率为80.0%,观察组明显高于对照组,两组比较具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:经过炮制的中药饮片运用于临床具有显著的效果,疗效可靠,安全性高,值得临床推广使用。Objective: To explore the clinical effect of different processing methods of Chinese medicinal decoction pieces. Methods: 100 patients admitted and treated in our hospital from January 2013 to January 2015, were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group, with 50 cases in each group. The control group was treated with conventional Chinese herbal medicine while the observation group received processed Chinese medicinal decoction pieces, and the clinical therapeutic effects of two groups were compared. Results: The cases of markedly effective, effective and ineffective of the observation group was 29, 18 and 3 respectively, the total effective rate was 94.0% while cases of markedly effective, effective and ineffective of the control group was 17, 23 and 10 respectively, the total effective rate was 80.0%, the observation group was significantly better than the control group, the difference was statistically significant (P<0.05). Conclusion: Processed Chinese medicinal decoction pieces had significant clinical effects, it was safe and reliable, therefore, it was worthy of clinical promotion and application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229