检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:梁晨[1]
机构地区:[1]清华大学法学院,北京100084
出 处:《医学与社会》2016年第6期80-83,87,共5页Medicine and Society
摘 要:烟草危害是当今世界最为严重的公共卫生问题之一。法律对公共卫生的直接调整,面临着个人自由、公众健康以及国家利益的冲突和博弈。通过侵权法实现法律对公共卫生的间接调整,是协调这一冲突的重要路径。然而,在烟草侵权诉讼中,因果关系之证成、赔偿范围之划定均面临困难,加之被告经常提出责任免除或减轻的抗辩,其实践效果差强人意。在现有法律调整不足的背景下,充分发挥诉讼外救济的功能,是适当填补受害人损失,进而间接增进公共健康的有效路径。The harm brought by tobacco is one of the most serious public health problems around the world. The direct regulation through public health governance may often face the value conflict between individual freedom,population health and state interests. To deal with the conflict,indirect regulation through Tort Law is considered a significant way. However,when it comes to the litigations about tobacco infringement,it may be difficult to prove the causation,or to evaluate the compensation. Defenses may also be raised by the defendant to exempt or diminish its responsibility. Thus the current legal practice is far from satisfaction. Given the deficiency of legal regulation,it is considered that ADR may effectively help the victims get compensation and consequently contribute to the improvement of public health.
关 键 词:公共卫生 产品责任 烟草诉讼 诉讼外纠纷解决机制
分 类 号:R126.4[医药卫生—环境卫生学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.200