检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]云南省腾冲市林业局,云南腾冲679100 [2]云南省高黎贡山国家级自然保护区保山管理局腾冲分局,云南腾冲679100
出 处:《安徽农业科学》2016年第10期171-173,共3页Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences
摘 要:通过文献研究法比较和分析了高保护价值区域和高保护价值森林的异同,结果表明:1高保护价值区域涵盖并扩展了高保护价值森林的内涵;2高保护价值区域概念的应用领域更广泛;3在高保护价值区域判定、保护和经营、监测与评价等方面可以借鉴高保护价值森林的理论和方法;4由于高保护价值区域还包含了森林以外的其他具有高保护价值属性的区域,在应用中不能完全照搬高保护价值森林的理论和方法。The similarity and difference of the high conservation value area and high conservation value forest are compared and studied based on the literature review. The results show that 1 high conservation value area covers the high conservation value forest and extends the connotation of the latter; 2 high conservation value area is a more commonly used concept; 3the theory and methodology of high conservation value forest could be referred to when judging,protection,management,monitoring and evaluation of the high conservation value area; 4 during the application of the theory and methodology of the high conservation value forest,the modification needs to be made since the the wider range of the high conservation value area,and it could cover the other area with high conservation value besides for the forest.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222