检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李黎明[1]
机构地区:[1]南京理工大学知识产权学院,江苏南京21009
出 处:《科学学研究》2016年第6期841-849,共9页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:国家知识产权局软科学课题(SS15-A-03);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助(30915013122)
摘 要:以全国各级法院受理的一审专利民事案件、专利行政案件数量与当期实用、外观专利授权量及滞后一期的发明授权量总和之比测度我国专利司法保护强度变化,与现有研究结论不同的是,入世后,我国专利司法保护强度逐年下降,2010年开始进入稳步增长阶段。中美出口价值指数的实证结果肯定了这一测算方法的合理性,专利保护强度与经济发展水平呈倒U型关系,这与美国经济学家Maskus(2000)研究结论是一致的。从产业层面数据看,专利保护强度与产业利润率之间同样存在倒U型关系,而且在2009年我国人均gdp到达临界点之前,相对非专利密集型产业而言,专利保护强度变化对专利密集型产业利润率提升更为显著,这也说明了加强专利密集型产业知识产权保护的重要性。In this paper,we make use of the ratio of the number of the first instance accepted patent civil and administration cases and the sum of the current grants of utility and design and the one year- lagged grants of invention to measure the change of the intensity of patent judicial protection. We found that the patent judicial protection did not show a steady growth trend until 2010; moreover,it showed a decline trend from 2002 to 2009,which is different from the conclusion of existing literatures. The empirical results of Sino-US export value index confirmed the reasonableness of the calculation method,as maskus showed in his study in 2000,the patent judicial protection and economic development show an inverted U- shaped relationship. From the level of industry,the patent judicial protection and industrial profit margin also show the same relationship; in addition,before the China's per capita gdp reach the critical point in 2009,the change of patent judicial protection has a more significant effect on patent- intensive industries than non- patent-intensive industries,which also shows the importance of strengthening the protection of intellectual property of patent- intensive industries.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222