论我国外观设计侵权判定之“整体比较”标准  

On the “Overall Comparison” Standard in Determination of the Design Infringement in China

作　　者：马竞遥[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院,广东广州510275

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第5期31-37,共7页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

摘　　要："整体比较"标准是我国外观设计侵权判定的主要依据,判定的核心是看产品外观设计整体视觉效果是否会对一般消费者造成混淆。随着我国经济社会的发展,部分外观设计重要性日渐凸显,加之《专利法》(修改草案)将部分外观设计纳入保护范围,"整体比较"标准已难以给予外观设计专利权更为全面、完善的保护,混淆标准遭到越来越多的理论质疑。文章借鉴美国外观设计侵权判定之标准,结合部分学者倡导的"创新标准",提出在现有外观设计侵权判定标准的基础上进行必要修正的建议,即在外观设计侵权判定中,将"整体比较"标准与"创新标准"整合运用、统筹考量,以有效解决目前外观设计侵权判定标准的不足。At present,the overall comparison standard constitutes the main basis for Chinese infringement judgment,the core of which is to determine whether the product design results in the consumers＇ visual confusion.However,with the economical and social development of China,Partial Design becomes increasingly important and is included in the protection scope of the Patent Law（ Draft Amendment）. Therefore,the overall comparison standard is unable to provide comprehensive and complete protection for Partial Design and also confusion standard is being theoretically challenged. To solve the current shortage in the design infringement criteria,the paper makes recommendations that amendment of the Criteria of Design Infringement Determination should be conducted by learning experience from the American design infringement judgment criteria and considering the ＂innovation criteria＂advocated by some scholars. In litigation of infringement of design,judges should integrate and consider comprehensively the ＂overall comparison＂standard and ＂innovation criteria＂.

关 键 词：外观设计 判定标准 整体比较 创新标准 混淆标准 

分 类 号：D923.42[政治法律—民商法学]