检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李维珍[1]
出 处:《菏泽医学专科学校学报》2016年第2期57-58,共2页Journal of Heze Medical College
摘 要:目的探讨改进痰培养标本采集处理方法对细菌学检验质量的影响。方法慢性支气管炎急性发作患者102例,按照就诊先后顺序分为两组,每组个51例。对照组采用常规自然咳痰方法,观察组采用改进痰标本采集处理方法。所获数据采用2检验。结果观察组患者采集标本质量合格率为90.2%,对照组合格率72.5%;观察组检出阳性率62.9%,对照组阳性率47.1%。两组比较,P<0.05,有显著性差异。结论改进痰培养标本采集处理法能够提高细菌学检验质量,值得推广。Objective To analyze improvement sputum culture specimen collection and processing method on the quality of the bacteriology inspection. Methods 102 cases of patients with chronic bronchitis acute episodes, according to the medical order is divided into two groups, each group of 51 cases. Control group using conventional natural expectoration method, observation group with the improved sputum specimen processing method. The data obtained by X-2 test. Results The observation group of patients specimens quality percent of pass is 90.2%, the control group72.5%. Observation group detection rate of 62.9%, 47.1% in the control group. Comparing the two groups, P〈0.05,there is significant difference. Conclusion The improved sputum culture specimen processing method can improve the quality of bacteriology inspection, is worth promoting.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145