检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]福建医科大学福建省老年医院教学医院,福州350003 [2]福建医科大学附属协和医院药学部,福州350001
出 处:《海峡药学》2016年第3期94-97,共4页Strait Pharmaceutical Journal
摘 要:目的分析3种抗菌药物治疗医院获得性肺炎的经济性,为临床合理用药提供参考。方法回顾性查阅某医院2013年1月~2014年6月HAP病例150例,分成3组(A组:头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠;B组:哌拉西林钠他唑巴坦钠;C组:美罗培南),用决策树分析3组治疗方案的经济性。结果 A组、B组、C组期望成本分别为7054.73元、6248.95元、12179.94元,成本效果比分别为78.39、76.49、141.76。结论哌拉西林钠他唑巴钠为3种治疗HAP常规手段的最经济方案。OBJECTIVE Analyze the economy of three kinds of antibiotics in treatment of patients with hospital acquired pneumonia( HAP),so as to provide guidance for clinical rational drug use. METHODS A retrospective survey was conducted in the HAP cases from January 2013 to June 2014 in a hospital. 150 cases were picked out and divided into three groups( group A: cefoperazonesodium and sulbactam sodium; group B: piperacillin sodium and tazobactm sodium;group C:meropenem). With economic analysis of three therapeutic schemes by decision tree analysis,the most cost-effective treatment scheme was selected. RESULTS The expected cost of group A,B and C were$ 7054. 73,6248. 95 and 12179. 94 respectively,the cost effectiveness ratios were 78. 39,76. 49 and 141. 76 respectively. CONCLUSION Piperacillin sodium and tazobactam was the most economical scheme for treatment of patients with HAP by these three conventional means.
关 键 词:决策树分析 头孢哌酮钠舒巴坦钠 哌拉西林钠他唑巴坦钠 美罗培南
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.173