从陈美案看操纵比赛的证据认定问题  

Evidence Issues of Match-Fixing in CAS Case of Vanessa Vanakorn

作　　者：郭树理[1] 曾琰媚 

机构地区：[1]苏州大学王健法学院,江苏苏州215006 [2]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《武汉体育学院学报》2016年第6期36-42,64,共8页Journal of Wuhan Sports University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(11CFX076)

摘　　要：国际体育仲裁院最近推翻了国际滑雪联合会对业余滑雪运动员、著名小提琴演奏家陈美操纵比赛的4年禁赛处罚,但仲裁裁决维持了取消她索契冬奥会参赛资格的处罚。该案反映出在操纵比赛案件证据认定问题上,国际体育仲裁院所坚持的一贯立场:应适用各体育组织的内部规则处理操纵比赛案件,尤其是在证明标准的适用问题上。陈美案仲裁裁决再次凸显了体育自治的重要意义。该案还明确了"放心满意"的证明标准在操纵比赛案件中适用的正当性,并释明了该证明标准的具体适用方法。在操纵比赛的案件中,有条件地适用严格责任的证明责任原则应当具有一定可行性。The Court of Arbitration for Sport（CAS）has overturned the sanction by the Federation International de Ski（FIS）which imposed a four-year ban on the world famous violin player and amateur skiing athlete Vanessa Vanakorn for match-fixing.However,the CAS Panel dismissed her appeal against the FIS Council＇s decision of canceling her competitions in the Sochi Winter Olympic Games.This case reflected the importance of the evidence issues and the Panel had answered the question of applicable law of evidence,the burden of proof and the standard of proof in the match-fixing allegations.This case reflected that the Panel showed a high regard for the sport autonomy and it illustrated the proper way to apply the proof standard of＂satisfaction confidence＂.It showed that the strict liability principle was possible to be applied in the match-fixing cases.

关 键 词：体育仲裁 操纵比赛 证明标准 严格责任 国际体育仲裁院 体育法学 

分 类 号：G80-05[文化科学—运动人体科学]