国际典型绿色建筑评价体系的节能效益评价关键要素对比  

Comparative analysis of energy performance assessment for green buildings:China green building rating system vs other major certification systems

作　　者：何玥儿 丁勇[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]重庆大学国家级低碳绿色建筑国际联合研究中心 [2]重庆大学三峡库区生态环境教育部重点实验室

出　　处：《暖通空调》2016年第6期79-86,共8页Heating Ventilating & Air Conditioning

基　　金：国家科技支撑计划项目课题建筑室内空气污染监测及运营管理技术研究(编号:2012BAJ02B06);夏热冬冷地区能源自维持住宅示范工程建模;测试及技术集成(编号:2013BAL01B03-6)

摘　　要：为探讨不同绿色建筑评价体系对建筑"绿色"性能评价的共性与差异,选取美国LEED、英国BREEAM、澳大利亚Green Star、新加坡Green Mark及我国绿色建筑评价体系,对比分析了评价体系构建、评分方式、考核指标权重设置。分析结果显示,建筑节能与能源利用在绿色建筑中所占比例最大。针对各评价体系的能效条款的对比结果表明:各评价体系中能源部分指标均可分为减少建筑用能、可再生能源利用、能源的环境效益三类;LEED,BREEAM和Green Star侧重节能效果性的评价,Green Mark和我国绿色建筑评价体系侧重节能措施性评价。提出了绿色建筑能效的关键要素和提高建筑能效的合理化建议。Carries out the comparative analysis of American LEED,British BREEAM,Australian Green Star,Singapors Green Mark and China green building rating system in order to understand their similarities and differences in green building performance assessment.Analyses the features of frames,scoring and weighting systems in each certification system. The result shows that energy related requirements in each system account for the largest proportion.In terms of the energy requirements in green buildings,compares the energy related items in various green building rating systems.The results show that energy related requirements can be classified into three categories：energy demand reduction,renewable energy use and environmental benefits;and LEED,BREEAM and Green Star are focused on the energy saving effect assessment,while Green Mark and green building rating system emphasize the application of energy saving measures.Summarizes the key factors of energy performance of green buildings and puts forward some suggestions to improve energy efficiency of green buildings.

关 键 词：绿色建筑评价体系 权重 节能效益 关键要素 对比分析 

分 类 号：TU201.5[建筑科学—建筑设计及理论]