福山“历史终结论”的三重逻辑——基于马克思主义世界历史理论的分析  

Triple Logic in Fukuyama's “History of The End”Theory:Based on Analysis of Marx's World History Theory

作　　者：王培洲[1] 

机构地区：[1]中共中央党校马克思主义学院,北京100091

出　　处：《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期36-41,共6页Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(14CKS020);国家社会科学基金后期资助项目(14FKS001);中共中央党校重点课题(DXZD201301)

摘　　要：福山的"历史终结论"一直在思想市场中存有一席之地,其历史理论的所指与马克思主义世界历史观的异质性源于唯心主义历史独断论与历史唯物主义的区别。福山将现代性中的资本逻辑视为其历史观的经济理由,从而遮蔽了马克思的政治经济学批判;又将寻求承认视为现代社会人权的出发点,实则是一种脱离经济基础,违背公平正义的政治哲学;其历史终结论在文化中直接反映为一种意识形态霸权理论,试图将"欧美现代性"蕴含的价值观转变为普世价值,进而再以普遍价值名义为自己的特殊道路做利益辩护。Fukuyama's'history of the end'theory plays animportant role in ideology market. It runs contrary to Marx's world history theory. History of dogmatic idealism is Fukuyama's theoretical sources,and Marx persists in historical materialism. Fukuyama regards capital logic in modernization as economic reasons,so he neglects Marx's critique of political economy. He gives priority to theory of recognition,seeing it as the basis of modern human rights,which isactually a political philosophy out of the economic basis actually. 'History of the end'theory tends to be a 'ideological hegemony'theory,and Fukuyama tries to change the value of the 'European and American modernity'into the universal value,and makesthe interests of their own special way in the name of universal value.

关 键 词：现代性 资本逻辑 承认 自由民主 意识形态 

分 类 号：A81[哲学宗教—马克思主义哲学]