检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2016年第7期1020-1024,共5页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的:了解大学生性别角色分布状况和人际关系发展状况并探讨两者的关系,为大学生更好的成长提供支持。方法:采用人际关系量表和大学生性别角色量表,对191名大学生进行测试。结果:在人际关系总体及4个因子中,仅异性交往(t =5.97,P <0.05)在性别差异显著;4种性别角色类型的分布在总体被试中差异显著(χ2=8.14,P <0.05);不同性别角色类型的大学生在人际关系总量表(F =5.00,P <0.01)及交际交往(F =6.80,P <0.01)、交谈行为(F =2.65,P <0.05)、异性困扰(F =3.35,P <0.05)3个分量表上有显著差异;男性正性量表与人际关系总量表存在显著负相关(r =‐0.301),女性正性量表与人际关系总量表负相关,但不显著。结论:双性化和男性化类型的大学生人际关系较好,男性正性特质能促进大学生的人际交往。Objective :To understand the distribution of gender roles and interpersonal relationship development of college students ,to explore the connection between them ,and to provide support for theirs'better growth .Methods :A total of 191 college students in China West Normal University were investigated by using Gender Role Questionnaire and Personal Relationship Synthetic Diagnostic Scale .Results :In the overall and four factors of human relationship scale ,only the opposite sex factor(t = 5 .97 ,P 〈 0 .05)was significantly different in sex .Notable differences were found in four types of gender role(χ2 = 8 .14 ,P 〈 0 .05) .There were significant differences among gender role of students in interpersonal relationship score(F = 5 .00 ,P 〈 0 .01) ,making friends(F = 6 .80 ,P 〈 0 .01) ,chat behavior(F = 2 .65 ,P〈 0 .05)and treating people(F = 3 .35 ,P 〈 0 .05) .Masculine positive inventory score was negatively correlated with in‐terpersonal relationship score(r = ‐0 .301) ,but female's was not significant .Conclusion :Androgynous and masculine types of college students have a better interpersonal relationship ,and male positive traits will promote interpersonal communication .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229