检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭博宇 沈峥[1,2] 顾敏燕[1,2] 贺群丹 缪佳[3] 张亚雷[1,2]
机构地区:[1]同济大学污染控制与资源化研究国家重点实验室,上海200092 [2]同济大学国家设施农业工程技术研究中心,上海200092 [3]浙江工业大学建筑工程学院,浙江杭州310014
出 处:《环境污染与防治》2016年第6期15-19,共5页Environmental Pollution & Control
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.21376180);上海市国际合作项目(No.14230710800);青浦区-同济大学科技合作项目(No.20143289);中央高校基本科研业务费专项(No.2870219026)
摘 要:考察了不同反应条件下,电絮凝法对微污染水中氨氮的去除效果及其影响因素,并探究了反应机制。结果表明:电絮凝法对于微污染水中的氨氮有较好的去除效果,且去除率随着电流密度和电解时间的增加而提高;初始pH过高或者过低都不利于氨氮的去除,在弱碱性时去除效果最佳;静沉时间对去除率的影响甚微。在电流密度为3.42mA/cm2、电解时间为30min、初始pH为7.O~9.0、静沉时间为20min的条件下,电絮凝法对微污染水中的氨氮具有最佳去除效果。Removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen and its influencing factors were investigated under different reaction conditions. The mechanism was also studied additionally. The results showed that the removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen by electrocoagulation method was quite satisfactory and increased by the elevation of current densi- ty and electrolytic time. High acid or alkaline conditions were all adverse to the removal efficiency while alkalescene condition was the most appropriate. Sediment time only had slight impact on the removal efficiency. Under the condi- tions of current density of 3.42 mA/cm2 ,electrolytic time of 30 min,initial pH of 7.0-9.0, sediment time of 20 min, the best removal efficiency of ammonia nitrogen for micro-polluted water was achieved.
分 类 号:X52[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112