非法言词证据的解释:利益格局与语词之争  

Interpretations on Illegal Oral Evidence:Interest Pattern and Dispute on Words

作　　者：吴洪淇[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]"2011计划"司法文明协同创新中心 [2]中国政法大学证据科学教育部重点实验室

出　　处：《法学家》2016年第3期67-79,177,共13页The Jurist

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"证据排除规则的运行机制研究"(11CFX056);2014年高等学校全国优秀博士学位论文作者专项资金资助项目"司法证明过程的机理与规制"(201406)研究成果

摘　　要：公检法机关在非法言词证据解释上的冲突是一个不断演化的过程。通过引入芝加哥学派的管辖权冲突理论,可以对作为刑事司法系统中行动主体的公检法三机关在不同阶段对非法言词证据作出的不同解释进行清晰地描摹。对非法言词证据排除规则作出客观化的解释从某种意义上来说是非常困难的。在解释的过程中,语词的含义更多地取决于利益的逻辑而非语词本身的逻辑。不同机构各自的利益关注、权力格局、冤假错案带来的舆论环境、政治大环境等一系列因素都会对非法言词证据的解释产生不同程度的影响。The different interpretations on illegal oral evidence among Ministry of Public Security\SPC\SPP were shaped in a progressive process.By the theory of jurisdictional conflict from Chicago Scholarship,we can describe the basic standpoints of these three institutions in their interpretations in different time.We find that it is difficult to interpret illegal oral evidence objectively.In the process of interpretation,the meaning of words often depended on the logic of interest but not that of words.Many extraneous and uncontrolled factors,such as interests of institutions,wrong conviction and public opinions,political circumstances,power pattern among different institutions and so on,would affect deeply the interpretations of illegal oral evidence.

关 键 词：非法言词证据 解释 管辖权冲突 定界 错案 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]