检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘文亭[1] 卫智军[1] 吕世杰[2] 孙世贤[3] 贾利娟 张爽[1] 王天乐[1] 代景忠[1] 卢志宏[1]
机构地区:[1]内蒙古农业大学生态环境学院,呼和浩特010019 [2]内蒙古农业大学理学院,呼和浩特010018 [3]中国农业科学院草原研究所,呼和浩特010010 [4]苏尼特右旗草原工作站,内蒙古锡林郭勒011200
出 处:《植物生态学报》2016年第6期564-573,共10页Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(31460126);国家重点基础研究发展计划(2014CB138805);国家科技支撑计划(2012BAD13B00);内蒙古自然科学基金(2015MS0349)
摘 要:草食动物采食对草地植物多样性和生态系统功能的影响机制是放牧生态学研究的核心问题。该研究以内蒙古锡林郭勒盟苏尼特右旗荒漠草原的长期放牧控制实验为平台,从既有草地植物多样性和动物偏食性两个层面系统地研究了荒漠草地植物多样性对草食动物采食的响应机制。结果显示:1)荒漠草地植物对草食动物采食呈现4种响应模式:放牧"隐没种"、放牧"敏感种"、放牧"无感种"、"绝对优势种";2)在群落尺度上,物种多样性指数随放牧强度增加而减少,与不放牧小区相比,重度放牧(HG)与适度放牧(MG)小区植物多样性均下降,且这一规律同样适用于功能群多样性,灌木半灌木这一功能群内物种多样性对放牧干扰较敏感;3)在草地既有植物的基础上,以不放牧小区为参考系,草食动物对植物功能群偏食性的排序为:一二年生草本(AB)>多年生杂类草(PF)>灌木半灌木(SS)>多年生禾草(PG),且偏食性物种主要分布于AB和PF中;4)植物多样性与动物偏食性基本呈显著负相关关系(p<0.05)。Aims The mechanism of herbivore foraging effect on plant diversity and ecosystem functions of grasslands is the core issue of grazing ecology research. This study is aimed to examine 1) how species respond to different grazing intensity in grassland, and how plant diversity responds to different grazing intensity within different organization scales and whether there are cascade effects across multiple organization scales? 2) How herbivore foraging affects plant diversity. Methods Based on a six-year grazing experiment in Sonid Right Banner, Xilingol, the study attempted to explain the relationships between plant diversity and herbivore foraging from two perspectives, i.e. plant diversity index and herbivore preference index. Important findings Results showed that there were four modes for desert grassland plant in response to herbivore: grazing-hidden species, grazing-sensitive species, grazing-non inductive species and absolute dominant species. At the community scale, species diversity index decreased with an increased grazing intensity. Compared with no grazing, heavy grazing and moderate grazing treatments decreased community plant diversity, and the same principle is applicable to the functional group diversity. Further analysis found that differences of grazing species diversity within a functional group were mainly caused by shrubs and semi-shrubs. Compared to plots without grazing, the herbivore preference degree on the whole species was lower for moderate grazing plots than heavy grazing ones. The foraging preference order on the plant functional groups was annual and biennial forbs(AB), perennial forbs(PF), shrubs and semi-shrubs(SS) and perennial grasses(PG). The preferred species were mainly distributed in AB and PF. The diversity index of plant and preference index of herbivore were basically significant and negatively correlated(p 0.05).
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.202.164