检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟江波[1]
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第15期105-106,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨交锁髓内钉内固定法与锁定加压钢板内固定法对胫骨骨折的临床治疗效果。方法回顾性分析2014年3月-2015年3月于我院收治的97例胫骨骨折患者临床资料,将交锁髓内钉法治疗的患者列入交锁髓内钉组,分析两组患者治疗效果及术中出血量、手术时间差异。结果交锁髓内钉组与锁定加压钢板组患者优良率比较:84.2%vs.85.0%(P=0.916),术中出血量、手术时间比较差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论交锁髓内钉内固定法与锁定加压钢板内固定法对胫骨骨折均有较好效果,均是治疗胫骨骨折的有效方法。Objective To explore the effect of thetreatmentfor patients with tibial fracture with interlocking intramedullary nail fixation and locking compression plate internal fixation. Methods The clinical data of 97 cases of tibial fractures treated in our hospital from March 2014 to March 2015 were retrospectively analyzed, compare the difference of intraoperative blood loss and operation time between the two groups. Results There was no significant difference in the effective rate between the two groups: 84.2% vs. 85.0%(P=0.916), and no difference in the amount of bleeding during operation and the time of operation(P〈0.05). Conclusion Internal fixation with interlocking intramedullary nail and locking compression plate fixation has a good effect on tibial fractures.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43