检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高志琼[1] 余爱华[1] 陆祖娥[1] 黄姣娥[2]
机构地区:[1]桂林医学院附属医院,广西桂林541001 [2]桂林医学院护理实验教学中心
出 处:《齐鲁护理杂志》2016年第12期4-6,共3页Journal of Qilu Nursing
基 金:广西壮族自治区卫生和计划生育委员会自筹经费科研课题(编号:Z2015406)
摘 要:目的:探讨综合护理阶段性干预在脑血管支架植入术患者中的应用效果。方法:将80例脑血管支架植入术患者随机分为对照组和观察组各40例,对照组按脑血管支架植入术传统护理模式进行健康指导,观察组在此基础上应用综合护理阶段性干预模式,比较两组患者干预前后焦虑自评量表(SAS)、抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分及出院前1 d护理满意度。结果:观察组干预后SAS、SDS评分低于对照组(P<0.01),护理满意度高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:综合护理干预可以有效改善脑血管支架植入术患者的负性心理,提高护理满意度。Objective: To explore the effect of the staged comprehensive nursing intervention in patients with cerebrovascular stent implantation. Methods: 80 patients with cerebrovascular stent implantation were randomly divided into the control group and the observation group( 40 cases in each group). The conventional health guidance was given to the patients in the control group and the staged comprehensive nursing intervention was additionally implemented in the observation group,the scores of SAS and SDS before and after the intervention and the satisfaction of the patients with nursing care one day before discharge were compared between the two groups. Results: The scores of SAS and SDS were lower in the observation group than the control group after the intervention( P〈0. 01); the satisfaction of the patients with nursing care was better in the observation group than the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion: The staged comprehensive nursing intervention can effectively relive the negative psychology of the patients and improve their satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15