我国科研人员对期刊评价认识的调查分析  

Investigation of Chinese Scientific Researchers' Understanding of Journal Evaluation

作　　者：耿海英[1] 苏金燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院中国社会科学评价中心,北京100732

出　　处：《图书与情报》2016年第2期107-112,共6页Library & Information

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"我国科学院系统图书馆数字资源利用状况与发展趋势研究"(项目编号:2011CTQ007)研究成果之一

摘　　要：文章通过问卷调查方法,分析探讨了我国科研人员对学术期刊评价的认识和态度。研究总共发放问卷5000份,回收2752份,回收率为55.04%。调查发现,高校在读生,特别是博士生,很关心学术期刊排名情况;科研人员也非常关心学术期刊的排名情况,其中以有副高、正高评审需求的30~50岁人群关心度最高;在四大期刊体系中,CSSCI知名度最高;定性、定量评价指标的重要性基本相同;被引用指标在评价期刊学术水平时认可度最高,转摘、下载指标次之;作者知名度越高,其论文学术水平越能得到大多数人的认可,作者单位知名度与这些单位作者的论文的学术水平之间呈正相关关系。调查结果也表明,参考文献越准确、越规范,则期刊的学术水平越高;外文文献使用比例的高低,通常也与论文的学术水平呈正相关关系。Researchers＇ understanding of journal evaluation is investigated through questionnaire survey. 5000 questionnaires were distributed, and 2752 were recovered. The recovery rate was 55.04%. The survey results are as follows：The students, especially doctoral students, are concerned about journal rankings. The researchers are also concerned about journal rankings, especially those of 30-50 years of age who need to be promoted to senior professional titles. Among the four evaluation systems, CSSCI of Nanjing University is most popular. The investigation showed that indicators for both qualitative and quantitative evaluations are more or less of equal importance. Citation indicator, followed by reprint and download indicator, is approved mostly among the journal evaluation indicators. The higher popularity an author enjoys, the more people approve his/her academic level. The popularity of author＇s institution and his/ her paper＇s academic level generally take on a positive correlation. Academic level of journal is higher if its references are more accurate, more standard. And almost the same tendency is demonstrated by the relation between the impact power of academic journals and their use of foreign language literature.

关 键 词：期刊评价 期刊排名 评价体系 评价指标 调查问卷 

分 类 号：G250.25[文化科学—图书馆学]