论上访事件中警察行为的定位与限度  

On the Orientation and Limit of Police Behavior in the Petition

作　　者：任学强[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院,上海201701

出　　处：《河北法学》2016年第7期82-89,共8页Hebei Law Science

基　　金：上海政法学院2016年度校级科研项目经费支持

摘　　要：警察参与接访、截访已是社会常态。上访事件中警察行为是介于"警务活动"与"非警务活动"的模糊地带,又被称为"模糊警务"。"模糊警务"的特点与上访事件的复杂性,决定了警察行为的配合性、预防性与变动性等基本特征。而应对群众上访而采取的"异地驻警"措施,可能带来警民对立、权威丧失以及超越法律的政治风险与法律风险。因此,在上访事件中,警察行为应当保持辅助性、被动性与个案性,以"违法行为地管辖"为原则,严格依据异地办案的程序,采取强制措施,以保证警察行为的规范化行使。The police involved in liberating the petitioners is a social norm. Police behavior is a fuzzy zone between ＂police activities＂ and ＂ non police activities＂, also known as ＂fuzzy policing＂. The characteristics of ＂ fuzzy policing＂ and the complexity of appeal events determine the basic features of police behavior, such as coordination, prevention . While coping with the group and should appeal to the masses and taken the measures of off-site police may confrontation between the police and the people, authority is lost and go beyond the legal political risk and legal risk. Therefore, in petitions Police behavior should keep an auxiliary, passive and case, to ＂illegal jurisdiction＂ principle, strict according to the remote handling procedures, take compulsory measures, in order to guarantee the exercise of the standardization of police behavior.

关 键 词：上访事件 模糊警务 异地驻警 规范化 

分 类 号：DF813[政治法律—法学]