机构地区:[1]华中师范大学城环学院,湖北武汉430079 [2]中国地质大学(武汉)经济管理学院,湖北武汉430016
出 处:《中国土地科学》2016年第4期28-34,共7页China Land Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金(71403095;41271534);湖北省国土资源行业科研专项经费(EZC-2014-ZX0299);中国地质大学(武汉)中央高校基本科研业务费(CUG160221);国家留学基金共同资助
摘 要:研究目的:通过分析农户对宅基地使用权确权效应的认知差异及其原因,为提高确权政策的实施绩效、促进农民宅基地合理流转提供一定依据。研究方法:描述性统计分析和有序Probit模型。研究结果:宅基地使用权确权具有一定的产权制度效应、经济效应及社会效应,但城市近郊农村、远郊纯农村和远郊风景秀丽区等不同类型农村的农户对确权效应的认知存在一定差异。(1)在产权制度效应方面,受益于政策宣传,三类农户均认识到确权具有法律上的产权安全效应,但远郊农户更倾向认为宅基地的财产权利与确权无关;城市近郊及远郊风景秀丽区农户比远郊纯农区农户更认可确权具有的产权排他性;离城市越近、受市场化影响越强烈的农村,农户的宅基地完整财产权利意识越强烈。(2)经济效应的认知上,大多数农户认为宅基地使用权确权后可自由交易且收益应全部归自己所得,仅有5.97%、4.44%和2.94%的近郊、远郊纯农区和远郊风景秀丽区的农户同意将流转收益在自己、国家和集体间进行分配。(3)农户对宅基地使用权确权的社会效应认可度较高,特别是近郊和远郊风景秀丽区农户认为宅基地使用权确权对促进社会公平、改善干群关系、减少邻里纠纷等方面具有较显著的意义。(4)农户所处区域的自然经济区位对农户认知的影响显著,同时受教育程度越高、家庭非农收入占比越大的农户越能清楚认知确权效应。研究结论:不同类型农户对确权效应的认知程度不同而可能影响确权的预期效果,因而有必要针对不同类型农村执行差别化的确权管理政策,以提高农村宅基地确权的政策实施绩效。By analyzing the differences of peasants' cognition about rural homestead rights confirmation and their factors,the paper tried to provide a basis to improve the confirmation policy efficiency and to facilitate the right transferring reasonably. Methods of descriptive statistical analysis and ordered Probit were used in the paper. Taking peasants in Wuhan for an example, the study finds that homestead rights confirmation has fight effect, economic effect and social effect to some extent. However, the cognition of peasants in suburban areas, pure agricultural areas in outer suburbs and scenic areas in outer suburbs are different. Firstly, all the peasants regard the right confirmation as an effective way to guarantee the homestead fight in law, while peasants from pure agricultural areas in outer suburbs tend to believe that the homestead fight is irrelevant to the fight confirmation. And farmers from suburban areas and scenic areas in outer suburbs think the homestead right becomes exclusive via confirmation. Furthermore, they also think the homestead right is ultimately complete. Secondly, most of farmers think the homestead right can be transferred and the revenue should be gained by themselves. Only 5.97%, 4.44% and 2.94% farmers in suburban, pure agricultural areas and scenic areas in outer suburbs agree to allocate the revenue among the country, the collectivity and individuals . Thirdly, farmers stress on the social effect of the right confirmation. Especially, the farmers in suburban and scenic areas think that right confirmation does good to prom.oting social fairness, to improving the relationship between officials and public as well as to reducing neighborhood dispute. In the end, the natural and economic location of farmers is an important factor to affect farmers' cognition. Moreover, farmers with higher education level and larger proportion of income from non-agricultural employment know more about the effect of right confirmation. So, the paper concludes that it is necessary to put forward diffe
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...