检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]黑龙江省农业科学院,哈尔滨150086 [2]东北林业大学
出 处:《东北林业大学学报》2016年第6期33-35,91,共4页Journal of Northeast Forestry University
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41503071);黑龙江省农业科学院引进博士人员科研启动金项目(201507-27)
摘 要:以3个树种健康复叶为试材,研究了叶内光合构件和支撑构件的生物量投资的种内种间变化规律。结果表明:水曲柳、胡桃楸和黄檗叶轴质量占复叶质量的比例分别为0.18、0.26和0.17,胡桃楸显著大于其它2个树种。跨物种尺度上,复叶大的树种需要更多的叶内支撑结构投资。但物种水平上,水曲柳叶片投资随叶增大而增大,胡桃楸则降低,黄檗基本稳定,表现出与跨物种水平上的叶片投资随叶增大而降低的普遍规律不同。今后需要加深物种水平上叶内生物量分配的异速生长的了解。We used the healthy compound leaves of Fraxinus mandshurica( FM),Juglans mandshurica( JM) and Phellodendron amurense( PA),we investigated the variations in biomass allocation between photosynthetic components and supporting components within leafs at the intra-and inter-species scales. The mean ratios of rachis to the compound leaf for FM,JM and PA were 0.18,0.26 and 0.17,respectively,with the value for the JM significantly higher than those of the other two species. Across species,the species with large compound need higher within-leaf investment to the supporting component. For particular species,however,with the biomass of compound leaf increasing,the lamina increased for the FM,but that decreased for the JM,and that for the PA was relative stable. There was a different pattern within species with the decreasing investment to lamina for larger compound leaf across species. It is necessary to improve the understanding of the allometry of biomass allocation within compound leaves at a species scale.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49