未成年人“教唆”未成年人实施侵权行为之监护人责任问题探究  

The Analysis of Guardians' Liabilities in the Case of Minors Instigating Other Minors to Infringe Minors

作　　者：张莹莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京化工大学文法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《北京化工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第2期45-50,56,共7页Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：现行《侵权责任法》仅针对成年人教唆侵权行为的责任进行规制,而忽略了未成年人"教唆"未成年人实施侵权行为的情形,使得各方主体的责任分担不甚明晰。以未成年人"教唆"未成年人侵权为切入点,分别从以下三个方面探究各方当事人的责任形态:我国有关未成年人侵权归责制度的立法历程以及背后隐含的立法目的,结合《侵权责任法》第9条与第32条的规定分析现阶段未成年人侵权事件中监护人的责任形态,针对现行制度瑕疵提出了进一步完善未成年人教唆侵权时监护人间责任分担制度的建议。In accordance with PRC Tort Law, the subject of infringement is limited to adult rather than minor. Therefore, a regulation blank appears when it comes to the situation that one minor instigates another to infringe some other minors. This research focuses on solutions of such problems, divided into three parts as follows： the first part gives a brief introduction of the development of laws and regulations as well as the legislative background and goals about doctrine of liability fixation of minor infringement; the second part mainly deals with the guardians＇ liabilities problems when pupils commit infringement, under Article 9 and Article 32 of PRC Tort Law; in the last part, a number of suggestions are put forward for the purposes of improving the laws and regulations on guardians＇ liabilities when minors instigate other minors to commit infringement.

关 键 词：未成年人侵权 教唆 监护人责任 归责原则 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]