检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京积水潭医院眼科,100044 [2]北京大学人民医院眼科
出 处:《中国药物与临床》2016年第6期792-794,共3页Chinese Remedies & Clinics
基 金:首都卫生发展科研专项2014-3-4086
摘 要:目的评估社区糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的远程筛查及2年随访的可行性。方法本研究为横断面研究。以免散瞳数码眼底照相机和计算机网络技术为基础,构建社区DR远程筛查随访系统。2013年7月至2015年7月北京德胜社区卫生服务中心管理的糖尿病患者数1 508例(3 016只眼)进行视力检查、DR诊断及随诊率进行评估。结果社区检查人员与专业检查人员的视力检查结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.78)。采用传统检查法与眼底照相法诊断,两者间诊断比较的kappa值为0.92;第二年患者随访率为72%,与第一年的首诊率差异无统计学意义(P=0.80)。结论社区DR远程筛查系统可满足DR患者筛查及随访的需求。Objective To evaluate the feasibility of remote screening for diabetic retinopathy (DR) in the com-munity level through a 2-year follow-up. Methods This was a cross-sectional study using an established community DR remote screening and follow-up system based on non-mydriatic fundus photography and computer networking. Be-tween July 2013 and July 2015, 1 508 subjects (3 016 eyes) registered to Beijing Desheng Community Health Services received visual examination, DR diagnostic screening, and were evaluated for compliance to follow-up. Results There was no statistically significant difference in results of visual examination conducted by community health work-ers vs professionalists (P=0.78). Good coincidence in diagnostic performance for DR was found between the classic method and fundus photography (kappa=0.92). The second-year rate of patient follow-up was 72%, which was compa-rable with the rate of first-year diagnosis (P=0.80). Conclusion Community remote screening system may meet the need for remote DR screening and follow-up of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3