论我国行政争议的行政调解解决机制  

On Our Country's Administrative Mediation Mechanisms in Administrative Dispute Resolution

作　　者：王东伟[1] 

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院,湖北武汉430072

出　　处：《华南理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第3期91-98,共8页Journal of South China University of Technology(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家2011计划"司法文明协同创新"相关研究成果

摘　　要：我国关于行政调解的立法在如火如荼地进行,各省市在规章和规范性文件中也都规定了行政调解解决行政争议和民事争议,然而行政调解解决行政争议的实践却门庭冷落。一方面有法律规定本身的原因,如法律规定可调解的行政争议的范围模糊、调解主体不中立以及调解的时限规定可能会与其他救济途径的启动期限冲突等,另一方面也有现实的原因。要改变现有规定在实践中遭遇的尴尬现状,需要明确行政调解解决行政争议的范围、建立具有中立性和权威性的行政调解主体、明确行政调解协议的效力等。There are much legislation on administrative mediation in the various provinces and cities. Although they have ruled that the administrative mediation resolves not only administrative disputes but also civil disputes,the practice of administrative mediation to solve administrative disputes does not hotly develop. On the one hand,there is the reason of the law itself,for example,the scope of administrative dispute is fuzzy,the subject of the administrative mediation is not neutral and authoritative,and the mediation period limits may conflict with the time of prescription of other relief,etc. On the other hand,there are realistic reasons. To change the embarrassing situation of the existing rules in encountering the practice,it is necessary to define the scope of administrative mediation in solving administrative disputes,to set up the neutrality and authority of administrative mediation main body,and to clear the effectiveness of the administrative mediation agreement.

关 键 词：行政调解 行政争议 调解协议 

分 类 号：D922.11[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]